Quick question: do exposure kills the affair and/or fog? I am positive my wife has maintained contact with the OP from office. Will she the similar emotional connect/support after it is widely exposed?
That's not the objective. Since you need to realize that the A started without you and continues to exist without you, ending the A also must end by the WS and OP, not you.
What you can do is to take steps to protect yourself, family, assets, property, health and life.
What most WS lack is empathy, being truthful and owning up to reality. WS can display concern and care for others but in a limited manner. It can cause supporters of your family to be swayed and even confused on how to deal with your family. Some may feel their loyalties are split or not want to hurt either one of you causing such persons to be useless in the way of support. Learn to be able to determine that and while you don't want to throw their friendship away, it may be safer to refrain from dealing with such ones for a while (until they realize the truth and determine whether they will support truth, support a lie or go into denial).
Another WS symptom, selective short term memory. As the WS time lengthens, the lack of memory factor can get worse. Also confusion on words and definitions. See the experience below.
If you get this point, you don't have to read further.
Exposure come in many forms but a successful one is done with the right focus and reason, to protect you and your family. Even protects your focus and mindset.
Let me share a recent example that covers a longer period of time. My STBXH was a/is a WS. He may have left off the physical part of the A but the emotional part he still retains to some degree. In other words, he still has the WS mindset. I call him WSt (WS traits). He has that title as long as he holds onto his WS traits and attitude.
WSt's A started in 2000 and the PA with the OW ended in 2004. It is now 2019 and my family and I still feel the ravages of his A plus his ongoing entitled attitude. A no empathy kind of guy (a trademark of a WS) and major memory lapse, changing the dynamics often far from reality.
But it doesn't mean he never has empathy, just a selective one. What does that tell you?
EX: WSt had a sub-contractor friend who was having issues with her H. Concerned her H maybe having an A. This 'friend' confided in WSt as they respected each other. I knew her a bit and worked with her on one of WSt's jobs. I know her to be a good person with morals and values.
WSt asked me to go talk to her and help her figure out what she needed to do. I told WSt that if I spoke to his friend on this subject, I may have to disclose what our family experience with his A. He agreed and said go ahead, say what you need to say. This was about 2015 - 2016. FYI: We split in 2017.
So I agreed and went to visit this sub-contractor. She was a bit of a basket case being betrayed and frustrated. Now in order to get my point across I disclosed not all but many of the relatable issues on WSt's A. We discussed a lot of the things we post here and was able to help her develop a plan.
From then to now, there have been about 2 - 3 instances where WSt has 'accused' me of 'bad-mouthing' him to friends like that sub-contractor and our other friends. Most recently, yesterday. I've reminded him each time that he asked me to go speak to her and approved me disclosing info.
2nd issue, a concerned friend called to see how we were doing. She is like a sister to WSt in his saner days. She gave a message for me to pass onto WSt that she is concerned on how we are doing and hope WSt can come back to his old self and restore his R with God. She is a woman with great faith by example, not just word. She knows about the A over all these years.
I passed on the message. WSt got angry and called her. She tried to reason with him but his only take away was that his reputation was being ruined by me.
Fast forward to last week, this friend called again, this time letting me know she and WSt spoke a while back. She didn't disclose all but some of the convo which also happened a while back. WSt admitted to calling her to 'tell her the truth' (aka: twisted truth). Neither gave complete disclosure, so once again I'm left with bits and pieces to connect.
Here's part of the take away, WSt accused our 'concerned friend' cornered Wst and gave him scoldings. Hmmm...... I noticed that once again WSt was misapplying words (another common issue for WS').
Here's what I texted him in response (edit out names):
You weren’t cornered by 'concerned friend'. Can’t you tell the difference between concerned vs cornered? PBR (OW from 2000) cornered me with her wild accusations. 'Concerned friend' was trying to reach your heart and took the risk of talking to you. You claim not to be a danger but do you know what danger you put us in before?Pay attention to the words concerned vs cornered. They are very different descriptions with different agendas and outcomes. Yet to the WS mindset, he couldn't tell the difference.
Also in both cases, I was asked to provide info and a valid reason.
Now does this bring clarity to what the BS faces? Also, realize if I gave a shorter version with less details, would you still have gotten the point?
Exposure, to help educate and protect you and your family.
Hope this helps.
jmo,
Orchid